That's not just a legitimate point, that's a keen insight. All four are injury-prone and aging. Hence, it would be entirely unrealistic (and unfair) to expect them to play at the levels that characterized their peak performance years. In other words, Alphonso, you are saying that when the cavalry arrives, even if the battle hasn't already been decided, the reinforcements really cannot make a significant difference?
Members of the blog can comment. To receive an e-mailed invitation, write to johnandsuzyn@gmail.com. And check spam if it doesn't show up. (Google account required.)
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.
That's not just a legitimate point, that's a keen insight. All four are injury-prone and aging. Hence, it would be entirely unrealistic (and unfair) to expect them to play at the levels that characterized their peak performance years. In other words, Alphonso, you are saying that when the cavalry arrives, even if the battle hasn't already been decided, the reinforcements really cannot make a significant difference?
ReplyDeleteThis is the tortured brooding of an soul-hurt man.
ReplyDeleteNo doubt about it.
ReplyDeleteA silly question. Jeter is better than Nunez. Tex is better defensively than the alternatives. A-Rod is better than...well, wait a minute...
ReplyDelete