Monday, September 22, 2014

You've got one game to save humanity, ONE GAME: What's your all-time lineup? (Hint: Mine has Jeter at SS)

My batting order in the Existential Baseball League ultimate wild card game. Beat this.

2b  Joe Morgan
cf  Willie Mays
rf  Babe Ruth
lf  Hank Aaron
1b  Lou Gehrig
c  Yogi Berra
3b  Brooks Robinson
ss  Derek Jeter
p  Bob Gibson

(If the existential gods allowed the designated hitter, I'd put Roberto Clemente in right and have Babe as DH.)

12 comments:

  1. Jackie Robinson 2B
    Willie Mays CF
    Babe Ruth DH
    Mantle RF
    Williams LF
    Gehrig 1B
    Schmidt 3B
    Berra C
    Ripken SS

    ReplyDelete
  2. pitching: Sandy Koufax

    ReplyDelete
  3. I knew somebody would say Koufax. I still go with Gibson. Nobody ever pitched angrier.

    Once, in a bench-clearing brawl against Cincinnati, Gibson went into the Reds dugout and fought three guys - including Pete Rose - at the same time.

    Before taking up baseball, Gibson played for the Harlem Globetrotters, roomed with Meadowlark Lemon, and was the guy who broke from the Sweet Georgia Brown routine to launch the dunk-a-thons.

    After Martin Luther King was shot, Gibson got into a huge argument with Tim McCarver, because McCarver claimed he knew how Gibson must be feeling. They almost came to blows, but patched it up.

    One game? I would go with Gibson.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Gotta go with Jackie Robinson over the worst announcer ever (well at least next to Tim McCarver).


    And heretic or not, I'd probably take Pete Rose at third. Need someone to hit leadoff...

    ReplyDelete
  5. Yes, Gibson was a great pitcher. It's a toss up between him and Koufax.

    Can't stand Morgan. Robinson was all world. Had Jeter's baseball intelligence but with more talent. I'd also take Cano and Jeff Kent over Morgan. I might even take Brian Roberts over him.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I thought of Jackie Robinson. It's amazing how there isn't one great 2B in the modern era who absolutely dominates as the greatest ever.

    We might even have to go back to Frankie Frisch or Nap Lapjoe - but I'm not sure I would turn over the fate of humanity to players that far removed from the modern day. (It's a stretch to think Ruth could pull his weight, but you cannot name a team without him. And Gehrig - it has to be Gehrig.)

    I left out Ty Cobb, though, because he piled up numbers instead of rings.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Rickey Henderson LF
    Derek Jeter SS
    Babe Ruth DH
    Joe DiMaggio CF
    Lou Gehrig 1B
    Mickey Mantle RF
    Yogi Berra C
    Joe Gordon 2B
    Graig Nettles 3B

    Whitey Ford P

    If they lose and it's the end of humanity, at least my last vision will have been a great team in pinstripes.

    ReplyDelete
  8. No one wants ARod at 3rd. Are we ashamed? Alex has to be in there somewhere either 3rd or SS, postseason numbers be damned.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Good point about A Rod. I went with Schmidt. A Rod is better statistically, though you have to adjust for the different eras. But, I have troulbe betting humanity on A Rod.

    I would put him on my all Yankee team, and would also go with Cano over Randolph and Richardson and Lazzeri.

    Jeter SS
    Mantle LF
    Ruth DH
    Dimaggio CF
    Gehrig 1B
    A Rod 3B
    Maris RF
    Berra C
    Cano 2B
    Ford P

    ReplyDelete
  10. Re: A-Rod.

    You can't dismiss his failures in the post-season, except for 2009. I think Brooks Robinson would make the play that wins the game and saves humanity.

    You save humanity with defense, right? And if Ruth, Mays and Aaron don't put runs on the board, maybe humanity doesn't even deserve to be saved.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I actually saw Brooks Robinson make two errors in the same inning. even as shocking as that was to a young lad, I'd still go with Brooksie on your twilight zone team.

    ReplyDelete

Members of the blog can comment. To receive an e-mailed invitation, write to johnandsuzyn@gmail.com. And check spam if it doesn't show up. (Google account required.)

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.