That day two years ago, when you ruled against switch-pitchers, was your rug too tight?
One professional pitcher in the universe throws from both sides. His name is Pat Venditte. He pitches for the Yankees. He may never make the majors. There may never be another. And yet -- when it came to choosing between him and a routine switch-hitter... your decision favored the hitter.
Venditte must declare which side he'll throw from -- giving the switch hitter an advantage.
CHANGE THE RULE, NOW.
Yesterday, Venditte -- a Single A pitcher -- made his debut at spring training, instantly becoming the most intriguing story in baseball. Several hitters into his outing, up came a switch-hitter -- who nobody will bother to remember. Then your rules took over, and Venditte had to declare his side, giving the hitter the advantage.
This is absurd. Do you want to rid baseball of something unique. What is the point? To save time? THERE'S ONE SWITCH-PITCHER IN ALL OF BASEBALL; HOW MUCH TIME ARE WE GOING TO SAVE?
CHANGE THE RULING, NOW.
When once-in-a-generation switch pitcher comes along, good grief, GIVE HIM THE BENEFIT OF THE DOUBT.
Who was your advisor, George Mitchell?
Yankee or not, he could be one of the great stories in sports. And yet, you favor the hitter?
Trade him to the Brewers and see what happens.
ReplyDeleteactually, by allowing venditte to choose which side the batter bats on, using scouting reports, he could force an excellent lefty power hitter planning on launching one over the short porch into a mediocre righty hitter. I like the rule.c
ReplyDelete