Thursday, March 30, 2017

The Yankees' shameful betrayal of Aaron Judge is becoming apparent

Two days ago, when the rumor yawned, stretched and climbed from its coffin, I was a complete Yankee climate-change denier. The rumor defied logic. 

Here was Aaron Judge, arguably the Yankees' most important prospect since Jeter, hitting .351 in Tampa, playing solid defense, age 24, having proved himself at Triple A and having earned his rightful shot at a major league roster - and the Yankees were going to kick him in those beach ball-sized nuts and send him to Scranton? Nah. Couldn't happen. No way. Nevah!

Then I remembered Rob Refsnyder, who two years ago hit .364 in the Grapefruit continuum. He stole bases, hit a homer, and he had played a year at Triple A - surely had earned a shot. But the Yankees had Stephen Drew... 

And then I recalled Francisco Cervelli, who for two years had been a Yankee catcher and good luck sign - who twice was rushed to a hospital in his Yankee uniform - cruelly dumped a day before coming north. (The Yankees traded George Kontos, to this day a serviceable reliever, so they could give the backup catching job to Chris Stewart and make Cervelli disappear.)

I thought of Mark Melancon and Melky Cabrera, discarded by a front office that had concluded they could best be converted into aging salary dumps - because, after all, that's that the Yankees represent: Big money veterans whose best years came with other franchises, an ongoing carnival of former all-stars plugged into a tradition that has sputtered now for 15 years.  

Yep, think about Refsnyder and the rest, and you can read today's tea leaves in a large Times Roman font: The so-called "Baby Bombers" is a mere advertising slogan, like the theme for Cellino and Barnes.. and yes, the Yankees will always choose a tired, bloated veteran - and his contract - over a young player. So today, we brace ourselves for news that Aaron Judge is going to Scranton (if he's not traded to another team.) 

The Gammonites are reporting universally that Judge will be demoted so the Satan-spawned contract of Jacoby Ellsbury can be seared into the grass of center field. Technically, the Yankees have touted an Olympian competition between Aaron Judge and Aaron Hicks, suggesting all spring that they would give youth a chance (even though Hicks is 27.) Meanwhile, Ellsbury and - yes - Brett Gardner are bolted into the lineup, despite each having done little over the last 12 months to generate hope.

Once again, the Yankees choose money. And listen: I'm not mad at Ellsbury or Gardner; both play hard and are, by all accounts, fine teammates. The problem is a front office that on Monday announces fiscal austerity - holding the line on Robbie Cano  - and then on Tuesday bestows a seven-year deal to a china doll like Ellsbury. Hal Steinbrenner claims the Yankees should contend and rebuild simultaneously, which veers back and forth between policies, leaving a front office that cannot stick to a plan.

I get it that the Yankees want Judge to play every day. I get it that Hicks doesn't resemble the stumble bum who last year hit .217. I get it that Gardner and Ellsbury have earned a first-round bye in spring competitions, and you don't shelve a veteran simply because of a crappy month of March. 

But here is what will happen: Sent to Scranton, Judge will be demoralized. He'll start in a deep slump. He'll fall into bad habits. He'll try to overcompensate by hitting home runs. And then, the worst: Yankee scouts will point to his problems and whisper to their Gammonitic water boys (and girls): "See? We told you!" Because in a certain way, the front office will want it to happen. Judge's failure will justify their decision to send him down. And another great Yankee hope will fade into the landscape of central Pennsylvania, until - that is - Judge winds up with another team. 

I get it that Judge may need all of 2017 to figure out major league pitching. 

But he cannot do it in Scranton.

You know, folks complain that we're too negative on this site. Well, when the Yankees start winning, trust me; You'll see us gush with positive thoughts. But not today. If the Yankees punt on Aaron Judge, they are punting on the hopes that they have selling. 


KD said...

Seems like the Yankees want the safe bet 82-win team over the risky bet that might bring you 90 wins if things work out, or 78 wins if they don't.

Almost all fans of this club would roll the dice on the kids, hoping for 90 wins and a "real" post season appearance. The one-and-out experience is fine with Hal, I suppose. A fine return on investment but one that leaves fans frustrated.

I can't boycott the team as that would hurt me more than them. But I swear, I will not watch any game that Hicks starts in RF. Like Ryan and Drew before him, I have had enough of Hicks. I'd rather go outside and pull weeds in the garden.

Eric K. said...

And Pete Kozma, who hit .209 in AAA, will likely travel north as a backup infielder, since Torreyes wll start at shortstop. We might as well get Brendan Ryan back. I was looking forward to watching Bird, Sanchez and Judge, but apparently Cashman and the brain trust have other ideas.

Local Bargain Jerk said...

It's also useful to note that Carter is still "over .500". From this morning's NY Post:

Chris Carter’s struggles at the plate continued. The NL leader in home runs and strikeouts a year ago with the Brewers fanned looking with the bases loaded in the fifth and has 26 Ks in 51 spring at-bats.

SO #26 came with the bases loaded. 26 out of 51 overall. He's having a torrid spring, boys and girls.

13bit said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
13bit said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
13bit said...

okay, I give up. I was just trying to insert an image, but blogger has gotten the best of me

KD said...

Judge opening day RF!!

el duque said...

I'm going to have to post 13bit's photo art on its own.

Too important to miss.

13bit said...

Thank you, Duque!

Anonymous said...