October 14, 2011 Friday
Dear Editor,
I just read Tim Dahlberg's column carping about small-market  teams in the baseball playoffs ("Small time isn't good for ratings," Oct. 10).  This is colossally irrelevant. I actually enjoyed watching lesser-known players.  Note the past tense. Baseball was my first love. To lose me took more than  strikes, excessive greed and scandals. It took boredom.
The games start late to accommodate television, and take too  long, in part to squeeze in more commercials and the huge contracts the TV  contracts must support. I haven't been able to stay up late enough to watch the  end of a game in 30 years. Some of us work. In the morning. Regular games often  take as long as a 15-inning game used to take, and they start an hour later. A  game should average 2 1/2 hours, max.
But more than that, on television the games are boring! Why? At  the stadium you see the whole tableau. On television you see closeups. On a  ground ball you see the ball moving against grass. On a fly ball you no longer  see the runner tag, and his race to beat the throw. It's cheaper than hiring a  director who can switch cameras to a long shot. We overuse technology in place  of intelligent direction. The excitement of the game is hidden. And the endless  replays, replays, replays. Sadly, the way baseball is shown on TV, it's only  good for curing insomnia. Never mind Yankees-Red Sox. I have  better things to do.
Harold Warren
Poughkeepsie
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Posts
Posts
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment