Thursday, November 16, 2017

Scott Boras on the Yankees: “The fact that their payroll is going to be under what it was 10 or 15 years ago is something that everyone in the game has to look at... What are their goals? What’s their principle?.. When you have a choice, what do you do with your success? What do you do with the greatness of your business operation? And how do you reward the fans that allowed that to happen?”

First, let's take a shower. Let's rinse off the cooties of craven self-interest. Let's recognize that Scott Boras is not exactly Abe Lincoln under a facial hair ban. He's a few gold chains removed from Tony Soprano, in that he long ago helped turn the sports agents' profession into a protection racket, greased with the kind of hype that Hulk Hogan and Randy Roddy would admire. The mere notion of a star player signing with Scott Boras sent shivers through an MLB front office, which had traditionally held all the cards in contract negotiations. For more than two decades now, Boras has been depicted as the supervillain in contract disputes, the barbarian who ruined a perfectly delightful gentleman's game, and always, always, always the reason why a beloved player just bolted from the town that raised him. He became baseball's Babadook, the demon that turns youngsters against their parent club. If not for that damned Boras, Alex woulda stayed in Seattle...

But listen: That quote upstairs? He's fucking right, and I can't let it wash over us, unnoticed. Yesterday, Boras touched upon one of the critical questions within the Yankiverse, one that we too often ignore. We bemoan the huge pots of money being wasted on a Jacoby Ellsbury or an A-Rod, and we think, If not for those damn contracts... as if our front office had been hypnotized by Boras' shiny watch.

As the Yankees head into 2018, once again Food Stamps Hal Steinbrenner is vowing to shrink payroll below the luxury tax threshold. That will mean - the Gammonites constantly assure us - the Yankees can bid next year on the likes of Bryce Harper, Manny Machado and/or Clayton Kershaw. This is the carrot cake being dangled in front of us: If we cut payroll now, we can spend big next year. But it begs the question: If Hal balks now, why won't he balk then? Harper may demand $40 million a year. Do any of us expect Hal to bite? Cheap is cheap, and the Yankee owner is not acting like a Yankee owner.

According to Forbes, the Yankees are worth $3.4 billion. That's more than three times what the Florida Marlins recently sold for, and it's not counting the Steinbrenners' minority ownership of the YES Network, which has been valued at more than the Yankees. Prince Hal has too much money to count. Whatever he saves this year in luxury taxes will be pocket change. In playing an austerity card, he is merely enjoying a parlor game: Let's have fun, Bootsie, and see how cheaply we can win the world series! 

Yesterday, shortly after Boras erupted, reporters approached Hal and recited the above quote. Hal's response was to smile and say, "I can see Scott saying that." And - yes - he's right. We must all consider the source and then take a shower. But here's the deal, folks:

THE ENTIRE YANKIVERSE NEEDS TO BE SAYING THAT, TOO.
 


This season, the Yankees will be chasing the World Series. We're not fantasizing another one-game Wild Card. And it will probably require Food Stamps Hal to reach deeper into his platinum purse than he wants. Right now, it means eating Ellsbury's contract until he becomes a trade chip commodity. It means shelling out for CC Sabathia on a one or two-year deal. It means finding and buying a lights-out bullpen lefty and, for God's sake, it means springing whatever it takes for the Japanese Babe Ruth. And if Babe-San is not available, it means going after a solid starting pitcher - and, yes, overpaying in almost every case.

Of course, the parlor game here is Hal trying to finagle all this while staying below his self-imposed fun payroll. That's where the Yankee fan-base needs to start asking questions. Boras is right: The team's payroll is shaping up to be less than it was a decade ago. That begs an honest question: What exactly are the goals of this team?

14 comments:

13bit said...

I contend that Hal can sleep well at night as long as the team his father bought brings in a certain percentage of profit. I don’t know what that number is, but there is a number in his head and, while he would like to win the Series because it would increase that number, he really doesn’t care or think about baseball so long as his annual profit level is reached. This is why I have been voting with my feet for the last couple of years and not dropping any coins into the bottomless wishing well that he owns up in the Bronx. Baseball is a business to him even more than to all the other people involved. It’s almost an abstract concept and he might even harbor a complete hatred for the game, based on his childhood in King George’s shadow. That being said, he knows where his bread is buttered, so he will keep the team and treat it like a home budget from the 1950s. He will buy what he needs, but be sensible about everything else and not splurge. Why buy a Cadillac when I Chevy will get you to the Catskills just as well? God knows, George made many mistakes, but we always knew he was a fanatic about winning. You cannot say that about HAL. He just wants his percentage and he’s happy about that. He’s actually a very bland little man with no imagination. And here’s another horrifying thought: perhaps the biggest baseball fan left on that team, the one who wants to win the most, the one with the most hunger — for whatever reasons — and whom we need the most in order to become the dynasty that is our birthright, that man is named Brian, Guardian of Greatness and Defender of the Realm.

KD said...

As anyone ever actually seen Hal at a game? We used to see George several times a year. Cashman is pretty much a regular. This Hal character, not once. Maybe he's shy. Maybe he disguises himself like those Russian spies on "The Americans" and I've actually sat next to him, discussing the finer points of Jeter's gift baskets or hypothesizing why Girardi so hates Sanchez behind the plate. but I suspect he'd simply rather be somewhere else. Does Papa John enjoy eating at his restaurants? Of course not. It's only a business and success is judged by profit margin. In this respect, Hal is no son of George. Yet there is a perverse logic to Hal's thinking. If profits are up, there must be fans in the seats and eyeballs glued to the screens at home. In other words, just enough success to stokes interest and keep fans engaged. you know, post season appearances most years. maybe a good run like this year. And who knows? A WS win every eight years or so sounds about right.

anyway, I have two suggestions that would make THIS fan happy to visit the Stadium. First, buy those damn parking decks from the city and charge a reasonable rate. Back in the 90's it was $5 to park. Now $35. Second, cut the beer price in half. A single beer would still cost double the bodega price of a six pack. Isn't that enough? Quit being so damn greedy. That is all.

13bit said...

My big discover last year, courtesy of my friend Tom, who is an avid reader here, but who doesn't post, was the Pinstripe Pass - $15 gets you in the big house. The only catch? No seat. Guess what? It was great. I was expecting the worst for my old, battered feet, but we ended up walking all over, leaning occasionally, eating from every vendor in the park, and taking solace in knowing that there WERE tables, chairs and TV screens within fainting distance. It was a great time and it only cost use fifteen smackeroos apiece, plus cash for food, which we ate like mad dogs. It was a great night and I hope they offer it again. I had a partial game package for years at the old stadium and moving to the new one, but they really made their intentions clear with us ticketholders when they moved to the new stadium. $$$$$ KA-CHING

Rufus T. Firefly said...

There are enough outfielders with talent in the Yankee's system. They don't need Harper.

A good starting pitcher (even if you think you are set there) is always useful to have...

Anonymous said...

I know this won't be received well but, it's a business not a public service.

The guy (Hal) has laid out a ton of money over the years, sometimes with success (2009) mostly not so much. They've made really dumb moves (Jacoby) and smart moves (this year's overall team construction and direction.)

He looks at the bottom line and says, "Hey! Why am I paying more than anyone else for the same thing because of this stupid luxury tax? Why am I subsidizing bull shit owners who don't invest in the team like I do? Why are other teams getting better results for less money? (Actual World Series titles)

So it's not so much, "Why buy a Cadillac when a Chevy will do?" as "Why did I just pay enough for a Cadillac and ended up with a Chevy?"

So in Hal's mind the luxury tax must go. No more paying 140 million for 100 million worth of ball player. Now, once he under I agree he'd better use the massive leverage of Yankee wealth to get what we need to put us over the top but I totally get his current obsession with getting the tax monkey off his back. It would piss me off too.

As to the stadium prices. Yeah they suck I used to drive down to the stadium , park in the garage, grab an upper deck seat, score a loose joint off a pretzel vendor and watch a ballgame for like ten, fifteen bucks. Now it's cheaper to watch a Broadway show than watch them play the White Sox on a Tuesday. Plus it never rains on Broadway. Then again a movie ticket is $15 so I don't know...

I live in CA. Beer at the state fair is $12. Parking at the Oakland Coliseum (or what ever it is they call it now)is $20. I can't even go to Pac Bell (or maybe it's ATT or Worldcom or whatever) in SF because the steak tartar costs more than my rent. So maybe seeing a Yankee game is market price. Sucks though.

Best deal in CA BTW is the Stockton Heat (AAA Hockey) sit behind the glass for $18 and if you go a s a group they'll give you a hat. I'm going to see the Westchester Knicks in two weeks and sit court-side for $40.

But I digress. So let me sum up. The team is lowering costs, losing bad contracts, and are fun to watch for the first time in years. They're playing the kids. That's a sea change.

I believe, and I have been wrong before, that once the hated luxury tax is out of the way they will spend again, as needed. But 400 million for Harper seems stupid. 400 million for Machado seems stupid when you can play Andujar or Torres.

It's a business. Not a public service. Sorry.

Doug K.

JM said...

Yeah, Doug, all of that is true, and it is a business, after all. But it's a business that rewards the owners whether they are successful at winning or not. The tax itself rewards team owners for doing nada in smaller markets. They can just live off the tax revenue they collect and let the teams struggle between crap and mediocrity.

Baseball is a very weird business. A monopoly that is allowed by law, dominated by lame teams in places that shouldn't even have teams in several cases. Like other owners, Hal personally has more money than he'll ever spend. And he doesn't have to answer to shareholders or a board of directors. He can basically do whatever he wants, whether that means spending stupidly or spending to win or not spending at all.

At the end of the day, the real money is in the value of the franchise, the name, the merch, the TV network you own. And it's really easy to coast and still see that value increase. There's no real pressure to sign only smart contracts, develop talent, or do anything comparable to a traditional business. Certainly not on the Yankees' level. You can do it if you want to have fun. You can not do it and still be a billionaire. Whatever. The stock price never goes down, only up.

It's basically a guarantee that you'll never really lose money. Even if you run a team into the ground, you get the juicy draft picks in return, which keeps your fans on a tether when they start to pan out. And if they don't, who cares? Flip the franchise for a gigantic sum if you feel like, or just collect the tax and TV money.

True, most teams want to win. The players want to win. But financially, eh. Not a necessity.

That's some business.

Anonymous said...

SORRY GUYS, I GOTTA CUT INTO THIS CONVERSATION WITH AN UP TO THE MINUTE CASHMAN CLUNKER ALERT.

WE HAVE GLEYBER TORRES, TYLER WADE, STARLIN CASTRO, DIDI GREGORIOUS, AND RONALD TORREYES IN OUR ALREADY TOO PACKED ARRAY OF MIDDLE INFIELDERS.

GUESS WHO CASHMAN IS TRYING TO GET RIGHT NOW?

JURICKSON PROFAR.

WTF IS HE DOING?

EVERY FUCKING YEAR, JURICKSON PROFAR.....WHERE THE FUCK CAN YOU PUT HIM????

MOTHERFUCKER.

SHIT LIKE THIS MAKES MY BLOOD BOIL.

MAKES NO SENSE, NO MATTER HOW YOU SPIN IT.

LIKE GETTING RUBEN TEJADA LAST YEAR, ONLY DOPIER BECAUSE OUR YOUNGEST HOPEFULS ALL HAD BREAKOUT SEASONS LAST YEAR.

Anonymous said...

John M,

I agree, sports is a weird business. Really it makes no sense to root for one. Yet I do.

I wake up, grab a cup of coffee and start reading the Post, the Daily News, RAB, and this site. I'm more concerned with who is going to be the manager than who is going to be the next CEO of Hewlit Packard. Damn! Dell just got Johnson! Nice run in Q4 though! I heard R&D got some good products coming up for next year...

Maybe I should have been more like that. At least I'd have a portfolio instead of a bunch of baseball cards.

Doug K.

HoraceClarke66 said...

ALL-CAPS, ixnay on the Uricksonjay Rofarpay ockerymay.

He's Utchday, you know, and it's probably Rbanuay Armerfay's greatest hope that the Yanks pick him up, making the Yanks the only team in MLB to have TWO Utchday citizens.

This e-mail written in official Pig Latin, so nobody from Ollandhay can decipher it.

HoraceClarke66 said...

Doug K., I hear ya, and I watch the games, too.

But baseball is NOT a business—at least, not a business like any of us will ever have the good fortune to be involved in.

For their new stadium, the Yankees got $1.2 BILLION in total state, local, and federal subsidies of one form or another. $1.2 BILLION—and only the latest in over four decades of massive subsidies for the Steinbrenner family, which without the Yankees would probably have been reduced to poverty, once George tanked its every other business.

In return, they REDUCED the total number of seats by 6,000, so they could build 44 more luxury boxes. They also destroyed two massive local, public parks, which they took over a decade to replace...and which STILL don't amount to the total acreage the Yankees snapped up for themselves.

So yeah, I think they should have some responsibility for treating their fans and their community better.

Anonymous said...

Horace,

I totally agree, particularly with your last two paragraphs. I'm not defending Hal or the way the Yankees go about their business with the exception of the luxury tax issue. I can understand why it's a big deal to them. They spend a lot of money for nothing and have to give it to their competitors.

"So yeah, I think they should have some responsibility for treating their fans and their community better" Absolutely!

Doug K.

BernBabyBern said...

What I've said about Hal since day one ... If given the choice between a World Series championship and a 10 million dollar profit, and third place and a 20 million dollar profit, he'll choose the latter every time.

Anonymous said...

THAT KILLS ME BERN....

....BUT I THINK YOU ARE RIGHT.

Anonymous said...

HAHA ON THE PIG LATIN HOSS....LOL