Monday, February 19, 2018

The 2018 Yankees need a Jacoby Ellsbury far more than a Red Thunder

Today, the Gammonite universe is feverish over the notion that Aaron Judge and Giancarlo Stanton could both take batting practice, reenacting last July's home run derby and possibly tweaking the game's two largest sets of gonads. It's a Gammonite's dream come true, and the Yankees are playing along. The team will open its parks early in 2018, so fans can watch a daily Indian Point Power Report display and eat more sushi, while the players try to hurt themselves by hitting balls to White Plains.  

It might be a baby step toward the hubris that always gets us in the end. Or maybe a daily mini-derby will indemnify our sluggers from giving a shit about the All-Star break contest, a celebration of hype nearly equivalent to the Super Bowl Halftime Show. If every day brings a mini-derby, who cares about Chris Berman's final moments in the sun? Let's hope, anyway...

But we should worry that the 2018 Yankees will become the All-Time Three-True Outcome Team - the three events being homers, walks and strikeouts. This would make the Yankees not only boring but prone to failing against tough pitchers - the kind you see in playoffs. Let's look at last year's HR/BB/K numbers and - assuming my math is right - consider what could be in store.

Brett Gardner  21/72/122
Aaron Judge 52/127/208
Giancarlo Stanton 59/85/163

Gary Sanchez 33/40/120
Didi Gregorius 25/25/70
Greg Bird 9/19/42 (prorated to entire season: 27/60/150)

Aaron Hicks 15/51/67 (prorated: 25/100/110)
secondbaseman (let's say: 14/50/110)
thirdbaseman (let's say 10/40/110)


For starters, the team's HR total - 276, not counting players off the bench - looks like comic book violence. It would beat the all-time team single season HR record, set by the Mariners in 1997 (264), which - it should be noted, didn't make it to the World Series. Add bench homers, and the 2018 Yankees could do what no team in history has done: Hit 300 homers. Ridiculous. I mean, flat out bonkers.

The lineup would also generate about 600 walks - not bad, even though well below the all-time record of 835, set by the 1949 Boston Redsocks. Add bench numbers, and it could reach 750 bases on balls. Huge. Still, the lineup has two problems: Gary Sanchez and Didi Gregorius do not take enough walks to fully do damage. If either can be more selective, the Yankees could walk their way into history. 

And then there is the downside: Our lineup would deliver 1,163 strikeouts, a crazy number for an AL team, though not the record. That was set by the miserable, super-tanking Astros of 2013, at 1,535 whiffs. If we add 60 strikeouts by our pitchers in inter-league games, plus a couple hundred by the bench, the Yankees could fall within striking distance (no pun intended) of the ultimate strikeout lineup in history. That's a lot of players walking back to the bench without putting a ball into play. It's a lot of time spent watching nothing happen.

A couple takeaways here: 

Such a team can win - runs are runs - but it would need solid pitching. 

The 2018 Yankees need a Jacoby Ellsbury more than a Clint Frazier - table-setters, not another HR power. 

Likewise, in the two open slots, 2B and 3B, the Yankees need a Ronald Torreyes more than a Mike Moustakas. Also, if both positions prove to be sinkholes - that is, lots of strikeouts and little production - this so-called super team could be more vulnerable than we may think. 

You have to love the homers, but get comfortable in the bean chair, folks. This could a season when nothing seems to happen. And when certain players go into a funk - they all do - the losses could be excruciating.  

10 comments:

KD said...

why isn't hit by pitch a "true" outcome?

HoraceClarke66 said...

Of course they won't win without solid pitching.

Teams that have won without solid pitching? Uh, ummm, err...

Pitching makes the world go round. It's why everything and anything happens.

Reasons why Japan lost the Second World War: Was it lack of a sufficient industrial base, a rigid strategy of fortifying all conquered territories, inter-service strife, the racist subjugation of other Asian peoples, and a disastrously arrogant miscalculation of American strength and resolve?

Nope. No pitching.

As for the hitting...no, we don't need Jacoby Ellsbury. Period. Because if his entire career is any indication, he will miss at least one-third of the season with injuries.

The OF/DH combination, if we're lucky, will likely be Judge/Stanton/Hicks/Gardner. But if one of them gets hurt—quick sacrifice to the JuJu gods—then yes, Clint Frazier would be the best substitute, followed by Billy McKinney, Jake Cave, and Tyler Austin.

Why?

Because if history is any guide, Jacoby will be on the flipping DL.

HoraceClarke66 said...

HOWEVER...Jacoby IS serving a valuable role in helping the Yanks run down soccer.

Today's one Times story outside the Olympics, tennis, or Nascar?

A piece on Jacoby!!!

That puts our totals at Soccer 25, Yankees 9, for the year, and Soccer 10, the rapidly closing Yanks 8, for February.

Yee-hah!

Anonymous said...

Good pitching beats good hitting.

Jacoby will be injured.

We will hit + 275 HR.

We will strike out over 1300 times.

You can't predict baseball.

“Painting at the corners is sponsored by CertaPro Painters. Because painting is personal.”

Local Bargain Jerk said...


I was just eating lunch and I wondered: Can Ellsbury play first or learn to play first? This would make him a pretty good insurance policy at a position that has nothing like the backup depth of the outfield.

Anonymous said...


Duque you make several good points. The first one has to do with batting practice. I really hope that they don't get caught up in a daily HR derby kind of thing. That's a fatigue injury just waiting to happen.

As an aside, that's a lot of balls (and money) going into the seats. I'm guessing the Yankees will want to attach huge rubber bands (like on those paddle ball racquets we played with as a kid) to the BP balls so the the balls can go over the fence and then snap back on to the playing field.

And yeah, they do need table setters because that's a lot of potential Ks.

My understanding is that Stanton changed his swing and closed his stance a bit and cut down on them significantly in the second half of last year and that Judge is also modifying to get to that low outside pitch that was giving him all of those called strike 3s. But I guess the season will tell.


Doug K.



HoraceClarke66 said...

And...J.D. Martinez signed with the Red Sox.

That hurts. But hey, it will make for a helluva race.

Rufus T. Firefly said...

I am one person who thinks the J.D. Martinez signing is good for the Yankees.

It will be like the Adrian Gonzalez signing (or even better Carl Crawford), but without the willing buyer after year two. Saddle the smahl mahket read sawx with another horrible contract, just like the Yankees have with Jacoby (HOF wing under construction) Ellsbury.

Anonymous said...

A guy whose on-base percentage tends to hover around league average or below, with no power, is not a table setter. He sucks on defense, he doesn't run well anymore. He's awful. Period.

Isiyku Abdulahi said...


I really want the world to know about this great man who brought back happiness into my life again after my husband left me and the kids 3 years ago for another women online when i contacted Dr Believe he cast a love spell for me within 48 hours my ex husband start calling me and begging for forgiveness for everything that have happened between us. I was so happy to have my family back together with love again here is the email of Dr Believe via believelovespelltemple@gmail.com a man with the great powers you can also call him or add him on Whats-app: +2348156148821
God bless you
I am very grateful for your help in my marriage.