All right, what are we to make of Ned (actually Ed) Williamson, of the 1884 Cubs (actually called the White Stockings still)?
Well, he had a Ruthian figure, at least.
It was Ned who set the all-time, single-season record of 27 homers in just 107 games, before The Babe broke it with 29, during the shortened, 1919 campaign.
This might be surprising, seeing as how Ned never hit more than 9 dingers in any other of the 13 seasons he played.
In fact, the whole White Stockings team surprised in the 1884 season, compiling a stunning 142 home runs as a team. Right on Ned's thick heels were second baseman Fred Pfeffer (25), outfielder Abner Dalrymple (22), and Cap "Worse Person Ever" Anson (21).
Aside from Anson, who got extra points for being a surly racist bastard, none of these individuals were exactly household names, and none made the Hall.
So what gives?
A good rule of thumb is, whenever you see some extraordinary burst of power back in the deadball era, cherchez the rules. Or the ballpark.
So it was with the White Stockings.
The White Stockings—who would also be called the Black Stockings, Colts, Ex-Colts, Rainmakers, Cowboys, Rough Riders, Zephyrs, Nationals, Recruits, Panamas, Spuds, Remnants, and Orphans before settling on "Cubs" no I'm not making this up—lost their very first ballpark in the Great Chicago Fire of 1871.
Searching for a place to play, they eventually settled on a new park on the site of the original, one that would be known variously as Lake-Shore Park, Lake-Front Park, or simply Lake Park. (Of course.)
As you can from this map of Chicago, it was squeezed into a corner of the waterfront, right behind the narrow beach and a railroad:
No, not there! There, on the left side of what looks like part of a peninsula. No, behind the sailboat, and just to the right of the big domed thing-y. That's right. It was that little.
Lake Whatever Park was just 186 feet to left, 196 to right, and 300 to dead center. The White Stockings first sought to work around these absurd dimensions by making anything that went over the wall a ground-rule double.
In 1883, the future Cubbies hit just 13 homers in 98 games—and 277 doubles. A record 49 of them by our Ned.
Figuring they could only make a good thing better, for 1884 the White Stockings changed that ground rule to make over-the-fence a home run, and records tumbled.Interestingly, neither all the doubles nor all the home runs could put Chicago on top again. The Pale Hose came in second in 1883, and tied for fourth in 1884.
After that...someone discovered that The Team of Many Names had been playing all along on public land. Off went the White Stockings, to the West Side Grounds, then eventually to Wrigley. The rest is...futility.
But what of Corpulent Ned?
He would go on playing the infield—becoming, despite his girth, one of the few players to move from third base to shortstop as he aged. He also played second, first, and even caught and pitched a little, appearing on the mound in 12 games over the years, and going 1-1.
Ned's decided to go on A.G. Spalding's famous "World Tour," a months-long circuit of the globe during which a team of all-stars ended up playing games in the shadow of the Sphinx, and in front of the partly built Eiffel Tower. The tour was supposedly about winning over all the foreigners to America's pastime, but in fact it seems to have been an attempt by Spalding to distract the stars and get them out of the way, while his fellow owners prepared for war with the players' union.
It seems that poor Ned got hurt playing ball in Paris, and didn't have the money for a doctor. Spalding refused to pay, and Williamson got into only 47 games in 1889, before closing out with the Chicago Players' League entry in 1890.He did not fare well in retirement. Ned, charitably listed as 5'11", 210 pounds while a player, took over running a saloon,and soon ballooned up to 250 pounds. Or maybe it was his diseases.
Williamson was soon suffering from both dropsy (edema) and consumption (tuberculosis), and died at just 36.
Want to know more? Believe it or not, there was a movie made about Ned—at least, his fateful trip to Paris on the world tour. It's billed as a 48-minute comedy, made in 2015 and available on YouTube. I've never seen it, but it sounds sort of intriguing.
In case you're interested, it's called Deadball, and listed here on IMDB. Good for a rainout? You tell me.
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt4531902/?ref_=fn_al_tt_3
19 comments:
How do you feel about MLB combining the Negro League records with MLB records? They just announced it.
I don't have a problem with it. They were all ballplayers playing their hearts out in professional leagues. I was reading about how they made some of the calculations and there was some thought that went into it.
I don't think there's any shame for Ty Cobb in being bumped by Josh Gibson, although we KNOW that Cobb would not have felt that way. Basically, there are bigger things in the world for me to worry about. Or try NOT to worry about, actually.
It's not really accurate, though, is it? It's a little like combining the stats of the MLB with the Pacific Coast League's. Very different leagues and competitive set.
I'm all for more recognition for the Negro League players and what they accomplished, in difficult circumstances, too. But this doesn't make sense. How much better or worse, for instance, would a player's stats be if they faced the same pitchers in the same parks? Would Gibson be even better? Would Cobb fare worse? There's no way to know. The comparison is simply speculation. And that's kind of demeaning in a way.
Besides, the Negro League teams didn't keep as complete a record of performance. So that's speculation on top of speculation. And what about the Hispanic league? Do they get lumped in, too?
Good motives, dumb practice, imo.
Nestor not so hot so far. We shall see.
JM - I agree. The League records should belong to people who played in the league. Should the African American players have been able to play in MLB the whole time? Absolutely! But they weren't. I don't see how you can include those numbers for the reasons you stated.
So when do Mexican League stats get lumped in? And, and the Japanese and Korean Leagues? Is it the fault of the players that they were born on the wrong side of the Pacific? Racism (history) can't be undone by re-shuffling statistics. It demeans the accomplishments of all involved. And stats neurotics who spend years of their lives nailing down the minutia of MLB stats have had a hell of a time getting things "right" . Were Negro League stat keepers as fastidious? I do know that early "MLB" records didn't become "reliable" until Date " X" (i.e., I don't know). At what point are the Negro Leagues considered reliable? I have only a shallow knowledge of the Negro Leagues, I have been under the impression that the stories and stats were akin to antecdotal stories of how far famous home runs have gone. Another way to put it, if UFOs aren't officially acknowledged then...
Yeah, it's really sort of apples and oranges.
Negro League baseball was both infinitely tougher and easier than major-league baseball. Relentless travel, awful conditions, little money, a constant fear of terrifying violence, bad treatment everywhere. There is no doubt that many players who could stand up to this would've been great stars in the majors, and when they did get to play white major leaguers, they held the edge—by just how much still being a matter of dispute.
But when it comes to statistics, how do you judge a season played against both teams filled with other great stars...and a bunch of road patsies? Which games do you count? The one in Mexico? In the D.R., in Cuba?
It makes the stats truly meaningless...
...On the other hand, I guess you could say that MLB sunk that ship when they let all the juicer stats stand.
I guess that the bottom line is, statistics only mean so much, in any and every context. It's great to always try to pump them for more meaning. But it comes down to this:
—Were the best ballplayers of color, Black and Hispanic, the equivalent of the best white players in the game before integration? Yes, beyond a doubt, they were.
—Can we ever "prove" this statistically? No, it's impossible to prove or disprove it with stats.
This strikes me as the MLB equivalent of land acknowledgements. "We're not actually going to do anything of substance to help the descendants of Native Americans, but as long as we make enough of the right noises, maybe nobody'll notice.
Baseball wants to make up for decades of segregation? They should be going all out to recruit more Black players now—and to make sure Hispanic players from the Caribbean are treated better.
Horace, I agree completely. And when it comes to the juicers I'll never forgive Selig. And the bastard-writer apologists who wish to induct (and will eventually) the cheaters into the Hall.I don't see how American Blacks can be "recruited" as you can't get kids to play what they don't want to play. When it becomes "cool", they will come.
Hoss, I think this is the beginning of a beautiful new book.
And seriously, the Angels?
PS, Horace, the Caribbean kids are really screwed over in so many ways. Hey! That might be an interesting topic for ahem, "somebody" to write an expose' book! Of course telling the whole Truth might be hazardous to the writer's health...
Dick Allen, out of serendipity comes... ;)
Crappy loss!!!!!!!
Haiku Tuesday / Special Kevin Edition
DJ Crappy Loss
Rat Turds in my apple sauce
Bye Bye Hernandez
This from the NY Post: "The legendary catcher will hold single-season records in batting average (.466), slugging percentage (.974) and OPS (1.474), the latter of which places him ahead of Barry Bonds’ 2004 season (1.421 OPS)".
Look, I have no desire to steal any thunder from men who got screwed by racist owners (or businessmen catering to their customers. Hmmm, interesting thought), but do those numbers look "reasonable"? The next set of stats were posted by a reader on a very nasty comments section. I didn't check them out, it's almost 3:00 AM. But I find, if true, the following to be very interesting:
Josh Gibson does not meet the Baseball Almanac requirement of a minimum of 1,000 games to be included on its all time batting average list.
Josh Gibson played 602 games with 2,168 at-bats.
---
MLB BATTING AVERAGE LEADERS WITH GAMES / AT BATS
-------Name ----------- Games-----At Bats
Ty Cobb ----------- 3,034------11,440
Rogers Hornsby -- 2,259--------8,173
Joe Jackson ------- 1,332--------4,981
Ed Delahanty------ 1,835--------7,505
Tris Speaker ------- 2,789------10,195
----
Average of top five --- 2,250--------8,459
THE POINT IS THAT GIBSON'S STATS ARE NOT EVEN ONE-THIRD OF THE GAMES NOR ONE-FOURTH OF THE AT-BATS OF THE TOP FIVE.
-----
THIS IS WHY EXCELLENCE OVER TIME REVEALS TRUE GREATNESS.
I WILL say that re-writing History to fit a political narrative is repugnant to me. The Nazis found it a useful technique for their "agenda". IMHO, History (unless later proven to be INACCURATE) is something that is sacrosanct. Playing with IT, no matter the agenda is wrong. The exclusion of Blacks in American Society was both shameful, and wrong. And I find Rob Manfred's timing and motives to be questionable. Of course commissioners of anything these days need scrutiny beyond measure. The varmits that ran The Shows of American Sports have always been dirtbags, but they were unabashed in what they did. What I can't stand about the new breed is their arrogance and mendacity. My commentary isn't racially motivated, doubtless some may take it that way. No, this is about intellectual honesty and my offence at being taken for an imbecile by such modern day scalawags. If this post is too inflammatory, the Keepers of the Flame naturally can delete it with no hard feelings on my part. I felt that some things just need to be said.
Are you saying that the League is trying to cover up their long history of institutionalized racism with a quick, craven move, a stat shuffle?
13bit, hmmm yeah that's another way of putting it. I kinda wish that I had saved the typing and gone straight for the throat.🙄
No, I see everybody's point. The Negro League players who made it there are indisputably great and they were prevented from testing their greatness against the "Major League" ballplayers but, as Hoss said, it's a bit of apples and oranges. NOT to minimize their achievements, but it's a bit of a false equivalence.
I just assume now that anything MLB does is bullshit, is NOT for the good of the game, and is done for some nefarious reason that ultimately goes back to money or ass-covering. They have always been a rotten organization, but it seems they are worse than ever now.
Post a Comment