Friday, August 17, 2018

And the Winner Is...

Why, the 1998 Yankees, of course!

Think back, back, twenty years, to before Brian Cashman was running the New York Yankees.

Well, actually he WAS running the Yankees.  But the team had been built by the Holy Trinity of Buck Showalter, Bob Watson, and—yes, the Holy Father Himself—Gene Michael.  Cashman...was still more like one of those little weaselly mammals, scurrying around between the feet of the Thunder Lizards.

What they built was indeed the greatest team in the history of professional baseball.  Here's why:

—They won the pennant and the World Series.

—They won 125 games, the most games ever won by any team, in a single series—not only in baseball, but in any sport, anywhere, in world history (Well, all right, somebody in the Pacific Coast League may have won more.  But those lunatics used to play, like, a 400-game regular seasons.  And they weren't a major league.)

—The 1998 Yankees took the regular season race by 22 games.

True, it was the three-division American League—but the second place team in the AL East (the Boston Red Sox), were also the second-best team in the league.  Had the winners of the Central or West divisions been in the AL East with the same records, the Yanks would have won by 25 or 26 games.

As it is, that 22-game margin is, I believe, the second-greatest margin ever, surpassed only by the 1902 Pittsburgh Pirates, in a year when Ban Johnson, creator of the new, upstart American League had deliberately stripped down every other team in the National League, so that there would NOT be a competitive race.

—The 1998 Yankees romped in the playoffs, going 11-2—with one of those losses being the infamous, "Blauch-head" meltdown.  In 1999, they went 11-1, meaning they went 22-3—an .888 clip—over the two postseasons.

This team could beat you long, and it could beat you short.

—The 1998 Yankees had a winning record in every single month of the season.  Their worst record was in September, when they went 16-11.  In three different months, they won 20 or more games.

In one-run games, they went 21-10, and in extra-inning games, 9-2.  In "blowouts" where they won by five or more runs, they went 42-13.

—Unlike any other of the teams usually ranked among the greatest ever, the Yankees also dominated against the National League.  Not only did they sweep the San Diego Padres in the World Series, they also went 13-3 in inter-league play, for a total of 17-3, or .850 ball against the Senior Circuit.

They won every series against six National League teams, who averaged 81 wins a year.  But those included winning three-of-four against the Atlanta Braves, who finished with 106 wins, the best record in the NL.  The Padres won 98 games, the third highest number in the NL.

—The 1998 Yankees scored 965 runs, and allowed only 656.  That comes out to a run differential of 5.96 to 4.05, for a margin of 1.91.

From what I can determine, only five teams have a higher run differential:  those 1902 Pirates, the 1906 Cubs, the 1927 Yankees (2.4), the 1936 and 1937 Yankees, and the 1939 Yankees, who had the highest differential ever (2.7 runs a game).

But of course, all those teams played before African Americans or Hispanics of any color at all were allowed to play in the show.

—The 1998 Yankees not only led the American League in runs scored.  They were also second in hits, fourth in home runs (with 207), second in stolen bases (with 153—and only 12th in caught stealing, with 63), first in walks, second in batting average (.288), first in on-base percentage, fourth in slugging, and first in on-base-plus-slugging (.825, or .827 without pitchers batting).

—The 1998 Yankees not only allowed the fewest runs scored in the American League.  They also allowed the fewest earned runs, hits, and home runs, and the second fewest walks.  They were first in ERA (3.82), complete games (22), and shutouts (8), third in saves, and fourth in strikeouts.

—The 1998 Yankees had almost unreal depth.  Nine different players hit 10 or more home runs.  The outfield consisted of Bernie Williams (who won a batting title and Gold Glove in centerfield), Paul O'Neill (.324, 116 ribbies, 15 stolen bases in 16 attempts), and Chad Curtis, but also Darryl Strawberry, Tim Raines, Ricky Ledee, and Shane Spencer.

When Davis was hurt early, Ledee and Strawberry filled in, in the OF and at DH.  When Darryl went down with cancer near the end of August, Davis came back and Spencer came up, hitting 10 homers (at least three for grand slams, I think), and batting .373 with a 1.321 OPS.  When he scuffled a little in the postseason, Ledee came back and hit .600 in the World Series.

Behind Jorge Posada, emerging at catcher with a fine season, was Joe Girardi.  The main backup infielder was Homer Bush, who hit .380, but behind him was the incredibly clutch, Luis "Mr. Five O'Clock Shadow" Sojo.  Getting a cup of coffee, before being insanely traded away, was Mike Lowell.

The starting rotation was Cone, Pettitte, Wells, and Hideki Irabu, the May AL pitcher of the month, but when Irabu's chronic injury problems kicked in, the Yanks pulled up, well, El Duque, who went 12-4  with a 3.13 ERA, and two critical postseason wins.

Behind them was the deepest Yankees bullpen, ever:  Graeme "The Boxing Kangaroo" Lloyd, Jeff Nelson, Ramiro Mendoza, Mike Stanton, and Mariano Rivera.  In other words, two righties, two lefties, then God.

—I could go on all night about this team.  But here is what I believe to be the one, unanswerable argument as to why they are the greatest of all time:

No one was juicing.

Or at least, so it appears.  It is impossible to know for sure, of course.  But the twin carriers of the PED plague, Jose Canseco and Roger Clemens had not yet made it to the Bronx.

What's more, there is no statistical or observational evidence that anyone was juicing.  No one looked suddenly ripped.  No one's head expanded by a size or two, as Barry Bonds' did.  No one on the team hit more than 28 home runs.  No one suddenly became able to hit for power AND average, especially at some advanced age.  No one exploded in a contract year.

In fact, with the notable exception of David Wells, who went 18-4 with a perfect game, NO ONE on the 1998 Yankees had a career year, which I believe is unique amongst teams vying for the title of the greatest ever.  And even Wells' season was not wildly beyond the form he had shown repeatedly, for shorter periods, in the past.

No, the evidence is overwhelming that the 1998 Yankees played without juicing, against team after team that WAS already clearly using PEDs.

I don't think any team, in any sport, ever, has faced a greater handicap.  Bernie Williams, slyly making his own case for a Hall-of-Fame spot, once said that, well, if he had not juiced but played against juicers for most of his career and done that well, shouldn't he be in the hall?

So should the Yankees of 1998 be the greatest team ever.  And not only so far, but for good.

As I already argued, you can't call teams before the "live ball"—really, "clean ball" era—prior to 1920, modern ballteams.  And you can't give the title to any team in an era when they wouldn't let black or brown people play.

And you can't give it to a team with any significant player juicing (looking at you, Juice D. Martinez).

Yes, plenty of PED usage still goes on in baseball (looking at you, Houston Astros staff).

And you know what?  A few years from now, it will probably seem like child's play.  If mankind survives the next 10-20 years—something I'd put at even money just now—PEDs will seem like child's play.  They'll be cloning spare tendons in the clubhouse microwave, and snapping them right on players.  In another half-century, it'll be like the Borg playing the Borg out there.

Which means, we saw the greatest team ever, in the sport as it can and should be played.  And they were our team.

That's pretty damned good.

Honor their name this weekend.  Honor what they did, and let it take us through the rest of this season, as we try to endure that bunch of slackers and goobers we currently have out there.














11 comments:

Joe of AZ said...

Amen!

1998 I was only 7...basking in the glory of yankee dominance...lording it over all the boys on the elementary yard...

98:
Back when the yanks had a REAL first baseman with "stamina" ( fuk u boone and ur lame ass excuses)

Back when the CF hit over.300...

Back when there was actually a leader in the clubhouse

The lineup had clutch hitters

The pitchers were fuckin gamers

The bench didn't strike out with the bases loaded

That team had grit unlike this gonad-less piir excuse fir a team that's rollin our nightly

A team whose catcher came to camp in shape and RAKED and whose passion/ Heart was the glue that knit the team together into champions....

Back when the Devil Ray's and their 5 day bulpen rotaton were nowhere to be found

Back when Boston was getting their ASS kicked wishing they had mr NO.2

Back when it was a matter of pride to play for Yankees...

Instead we have the state puft marshmallow man who plays like he'd rather be ANYWHERE ELSE but at the game(seriously every camera view of the guy shows him eating and running his lips, watch a damn film on ADJUSTMENTS you can make before you return)

A first baseman who is made out of glass and can't BUY a cluth hit

A coach who has less brains than a hamster..

Bout to cry now ...Long live the fuken ice cream sandwich

JM said...

I still have an issue with excluding old time teams, especially because they were pre-Jackie. (By the way, did you know that black Cubans played in the very old days? Owners would claim they weren't black, they were "just" from the Caribbean.) The idea of greatness is completely relative to the state of the game and the other teams' performance vs any team in question. Ignoring Ruth and Gehrig and Cy and Hank Greenberg and Cobb and...well, you get the idea.

So in terms of the greatest team of all time but only since the late 1940s, which is a bit more than half the history of modern ball, this is a good choice.

HoraceClarke66 said...

I hear ya, Joe F. That year, we just seemed world's above everybody else. I remember going with some Mets fan friends to see the Queens team down the stretch. They had a chance to make the playoffs as the wild card, but lost their last five straight, including the game we were at.

It was all I could do to be consoling, and not to gloat.

Also, one thing I could have added: that 1998 Yankees team could take a punch.

I was at a doubleheader against Detroit on July 20th. They blew a horrible game in the opener, lost a 3-0 lead late, when Torre left Wells in too long; left 22 guys on base, went 1-17 with men in scoring position. Just awful.

Next game, with nothing much to play for—they already had a huge lead—they won, 4-3, in the wee small hours of the night. Homer Bush had three hits, and a key sacrifice bunt, if I recall correctly.

Same thing in the playoffs. They had the Blauch-head game, then Bartolo Colon shut them down. They were playing in Cleveland, against an Indians team that had just traumatized them in the playoffs the year before.

But El Duque pitched a shutout, Wells won while jawing back and forth with the fans, and then they took the finale back in the Bronx, despite a Cone meltdown.

Tough, tough, tough.

The only living boy in Wishaw said...

Thanks for writing these articles I really enjoyed reading them

Best wishes from Wishaw Scotland
John

HoraceClarke66 said...

Fair enough, John M.

Yeah, John McGraw, who was always a pro-integrationist, tried to get a great black second baseman named Charlie Grant in as a Native American, saying he was named Yokohama. (Indians, for some reason, being the one exception to the color line.)

Clark Griffith, owner of the Senators, told Charlie Comiskey of the White Sox, who cracked, "If McGraw keeps this Indian, I'll put a Chinaman on third base."

What great human beings Griffith and Comiskey were, huh? How much they did for the game. So glad they're in the Hall.

In any case, no Hispanic players of much hue at all were getting into the majors. The Cincinnati Reds signed a couple of Cubans, including Dolf Luque—but as you can see here, Luque looked extremely white. https://www.baseball-reference.com/players/l/luquedo01.shtml

Of course, Ted Williams' mother was Mexican-American, and later the Senators had some Hispanic players. But again, you had to really be a pale face to get by.

KD said...

and not one mention of 7.5 WAR Derek Jeter?

HoraceClarke66 said...

As to including those teams in the greatest of competitions...

Well, the general consensus of baseball experts is that either the 1927 Yankees (James' pick) or the 1939 Yankees (Neyer and Epstein, many others) were the best ever.

Frankly, I suspect that if there had been no color line, the Yankees after 1915—as the team most inclined to and capable of identifying and signing good players—would have been even MORE dominant. And then there's the fact that some people think Babe Ruth WAS black.

But you can't know. Thanks to the fact that George Weiss was an inveterate racist, only the Phillies, Tigers, and Red Sox put black players on their rosters after we did, and we may have missed out on opportunities to sign Willie Mays and Ernie Banks.

(Though I will note that the first Yankee of color, Elston Howard, also became the first black MVP in the AL.)

Much as missing out on the possibility of Mays and Mantle playing in the same Yankees outfield sometimes makes me want to weep, you can't say anything for sure, and not having so many great players in the game—I think—disqualifies any team pre-1947...

HoraceClarke66 said...

But to take a look at those teams:

—The 1906 Chicago Cubs had fantastic pitching, Tinker-to-Evers-to-Chance, and were completely dominant, going 116-36 in the regular season. But I just can't call a team that lost the World Series to a group known as "The Hitless Wonders" the greatest team of all time. Plus, it was the dead ball era.

—The 1927 Yankees were dominant as few teams have ever been. Besides that 2.4 run differential, as a team, they led the league in just about everything. No other TEAM in the AL hit as many homers as Ruth did, with 60, and the top three HR hitters in the league were Ruth, Gehrig (47), and Lazzeri (18). They hit .307, altogether.

The pitching was also completely dominant, with five terrific starters, and Wilcy Moore, Mr. Everything, spot-starting and relieving to get 19 wins and 13 saves. The fielding was excellent, especially in the outfield, with Ruth, Combs, and Bob Meusel. And the team swept the World Series.

But this team had some hitting dead spots, at catcher and third, a shortstop who was widely considered only okay, and not much of a bench. It depended to an enormous degree on one of several versions of "Murderers' Row": Combs, Ruth, Gehrig, Meusel, and Lazzeri. It would be intriguing to see how they'd do in a modern setting, but I suspect the lack of depth would wear them down.

—The 1939 Yanks also swept the World Series, and won 106 games—and that was despite losing the greatest first baseman ever, Lou Gehrig, to ALS. (In fact, the team's one, brief slump that year, a six-game losing streak, seems to have been caused in part by the fact that the team was simply mourning, after Gehrig's emotional "Luckiest Man" speech; a touching tribute to its humanity.)

The 1939 Yanks had that 2.7 run differential, led the league in most hitting categories and completely dominated in pitching, and swept the World Series. They had an outfield so good—in DiMaggio, King Kong Keller, and George "Twinkletoes" Selkirk— that not even Tommy Henrich could start. Red Rolfe had a career year at third, Bill Dickey had his last great year behind the plate, and Flash Gordon was fantastic at second.

What's more, this team overcame serious injuries. Not just Gehrig, but DiMaggio missed 34 games—and a good chance to hit over .400—with an eye problem. It had more of a bench than the 1927 team, it was practically dripping with excess pitchers.

Flaws? Well, Babe Dahlgren, Gehrig's replacement at first, was pretty awful, and Frankie Crosetti had a bad year at short, hitting only .233. But overall, I think this team could have given anybody today a run for their money.

But again: hard to say, without at least 30-50 leading black and Hispanic players left out of the majors...

Local Bargain Jerk said...


They'll be cloning spare tendons in the clubhouse microwave, and snapping them right on players.


Aren't they already doing that? Isn't that what they did to Curt Schilling, except they left his tendon in the microwave for 20 seconds too long which explains the ketchup on his sock?

Or am I misremembering?

HoraceClarke66 said...

Love it, LBJ! But hey, it would've been unsportsmanlike to bunt on him!

(His juicing, and the juicing of Big Papi, Manny, Mueller, and about 2/3 of that Red Sox team was very sporting.)

Isiyku Abdulahi said...


I really want the world to know about this great man who brought back happiness into my life again after my husband left me and the kids 3 years ago for another women online when i contacted Dr Believe he cast a love spell for me within 48 hours my ex husband start calling me and begging for forgiveness for everything that have happened between us. I was so happy to have my family back together with love again here is the email of Dr Believe via believelovespelltemple@gmail.com a man with the great powers you can also call him or add him on Whats-app: +2348156148821
God bless you
I am very grateful for your help in my marriage.